Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) says he has the votes to amend the Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations bill. The amendment would block Labor Department funding to implement any regulation that would take away the right for overtime pay for workers.

The Labor Department has proposed a rule that would update the criteria used to determine what jobs are eligible for overtime under the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act. The preliminary rule, which was issued in March, would allow 1.3 million low-income workers who are now exempt from overtime pay to become eligible. The administration proposal could also deny overtime benefits for at least 644,000 workers.

A similar amendment by Congressman David Obey (D-Wisconsin) to the House Labor-HHS-Education spending bill was defeated in July. President Bush threatened to veto the whole bill if Congressman Obey’s language had been attached.

Today, the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation and Treasury will initiate Senate debate on Amtrak funding for FY 2004.

On July 23, the House Appropriations Committee funded Amtrak at $900 million for FY 2004, which is what the President had asked for in his budget request. There was much controversy after the House Appropriations Subcommittee drafted a spending bill for the Transportation and Treasury Departments, which only included $580 million for Amtrak. Representative Ernest Istook (R-Oklahoma), who chairs the subcommittee, was forced to increase Amtrak funding to $900 million before the full committee markup to allay the concerns of wavering committee members. The bill is expected to be brought before the full House on Thursday. House Democrats are expected to introduce an amendment that will increase Amtrak funding to $1.4 billion. A similar amendment failed to garner enough votes in full committee.

Amtrak supporters in the Senate favor providing Amtrak the full $1.8 billion the railroad requested earlier this year. Conservative Republicans in the House generally support structural overhaul for intercity passenger rail and feel that Amtrak should receive less funding. However, many Senate Republicans including Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-Texas) feel that increased funding for Amtrak should be contemporaneous with modest reform for the railroad. Hutchinson recently co-sponsored legislation that would reauthorize Amtrak at $60 billion over 6 years, which is more than Amtrak had originally requested.

Hutchinson feels the full Senate Appropriations Committee could support a funding level of $1.4 billion for Amtrak. The general consensus among rail lobbyists is that the full committee will provide $1.2 billion for Amtrak. Once both chambers complete work on the transportation and treasury spending bill, the legislation will head to a conference committee, in which conservatives are likely to vigorously oppose additional Amtrak funding. However, Amtrak has maintained that they need $1.8 billion to remain fully operational throughout the next fiscal year.

Please continue to check back with us for updates on this matter.

Congress returns today and for those in the transportation community, the uncertainty over the fate of TEA-21 reauthorization continues. We have been reporting to our clients and friends for many weeks that prospects for significant action on the legislation this year are slim. We stick by that analysis of the situation. However, rhetorical flourishes from leaders of key committees on Capitol Hill will continue to suggest that action IS forthcoming and soon. This report will look ahead over the next two-to-three months in an effort to give our readers an idea of what to expect.

On the House side, there is a chance the bipartisan leadership of the Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure will pull together in September a six-year reauthorization plan – at least in outline form – and give House Members the opportunity to review it. In particular, the committee appears anxious to show Members how the $ 375 billion package would affect funding for highways and transit in their districts and states. Staff worked hard to put together such a plan before recess but was unable to complete work. Work has continued over the recess and some significant issues are apparently being resolved. However, many remain unresolved. Significant work remains at the staff and Member level before a bipartisan product is ready for release.

If the committee leadership does release a draft bill, it will be very difficult for meaningful action to take place on it this fall. House leadership is nowhere near an agreement to allow a bill to come to the floor which would require a user fee increase. The House Committee on Ways and Means is occupied with Medicare prescription drugs and welfare reform and is unlikely to turn any attention to a controversial highway/transit revenue title.

On the Senate side, Committee on Environment and Public Works Chairman James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) continues to talk about marking-up a six-year bill in September. We have been hard-pressed to find any staff of committee members who believe this can happen. In large part, the reason is that there is not enough money on the table to allow Chairman Inhofe to achieve is goal of ensuring “donor states” receive a 95% return on the user fees they send to Washington. The Committee on Finance has been reviewing for months a proposal from Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ranking Member Max Baucus (D-Montana) to increase resources for transportation through bonding. The current version of the proposal would call for the Treasury Department to sell General Obligation bonds and dedicate the proceeds to transportation. This would circumvent some of the budgetary controls under which Congress operates. The Senate Banking Committee, with jurisdiction over the transit program, has objected strongly to the bonding idea. Leadership has said unless agreement is reached by the relevant committees on how to move forward, the bill will not reach the Senate floor. There is no sign of agreement yet.

So, if a six-year reauthorization is not in the cards, what can we expect? At present, there appears to be consensus building on the House side for a six-month extension to TEA-21. It is thought this short time period will keep the pressure on to get a bill done. On the Senate side, three options are being discussed – six months, one year and two years. The two year option is being discussed mostly by Senate Environment and Public Works Committee staff. It is viewed as a way spare Congress and the President from having to discuss a possible user fee increase during the election season. With all of these options on the table, it may well come down to whether or not the Administration weighs-in on their preference. At this juncture, we say a one-year extension as being likely as a compromise.

In summary then, there is some hope that we will see this Fall a further fleshing-out of “TEA 3” plans by the key committees in the House and Senate. There is almost no hope a six-year bill will be completed or even the subject of significant action.

As always, we will be keeping our fingers on the pulse on Capitol Hill and will keep you informed of the ebb and flow of discussions.

Congress returns September 2 from a five-week recess in hopes of tackling some major issues. Among the items leadership offices in the House and Senate are seeking to complete before the end of the session are these:

• Appropriations Bills – all 13 appropriations bill await final approval by Congress. Each week in September is likely to see significant action on appropriations measures as Congress drives to complete as many as possible by the beginning of fiscal 2004 on October 1.
• Medicare Prescription Drugs – staff-level meetings have been going on through most of the recess. Significant issues remain unresolved and there are some who believe the situation has been exacerbated by some of the feedback Members of Congress have gotten from senior citizens over the recess. According to newspaper accounts, many seniors are telling Members the benefits in the House and Senate bills are inadequate. There will be a very strong drive by leadership and the White House to get this bill done before Congress goes home for the year. Success in drafting a compromise version could well drag the session on until close to Thanksgiving.
• Welfare Reform – prospects for extending and revising the TANF program this year have not improved in the last five weeks. Especially troubling have been new deficit projections from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) which make it clear problems with the program will be difficult to solve with additional funding.
• Energy Bill – The Senate punted the comprehensive energy bill to conference on July 31 by passing the same bill it passed last year – effectively giving up for the time being on putting together a new version until the conference with the House. The situation was bad enough when Congress left, but the blackout in Northeastern and Midwestern states in August may well have sunk the chances for an energy bill this year. Senators from the affected states will want to take a fresh look at using the bill as a way to ensure reliability in the performance of power grids. Some of them may seek to break-off legislation on that topic as a separate “emergency” measure. If they do, leadership – anxious to get the comprehensive bill done – will likely resist. Further complicating matters was one of the Administration’s responses to the blackout – rolling back New Source Review regulations affecting power plants. This controversial regulatory action, taken within days of the blackout, will ensure additional heated debate on this topic.

While there is likely to be considerable talk about other topics – reauthorization of TEA-21 among those – leadership offices appear not to be focusing on adding to the already difficult agenda they have laid out.

We expect a leadership pow-wow shortly after Congress returns to settle on plans for the remainder of the session. Before recess, there was talk of a long session and the insertion of a previously unplanned recess over the Yom Kippur/Columbus Day period. If leadership decides to try to tackle the issues outlined above, we may well see an announcement of that recess. If they decide success on these matters is not possible, we may see a session which adjourns before mid-October.

As always stay tuned and we will keep you informed of developments.